VIENNA |
(Reuters) - Iran appears to be advancing in its construction
of a research reactor Western experts say could offer the Islamic state
a second way of producing material for a nuclear bomb, if it decided to
embark on such a course, a U.N. report showed.Iran has almost completed installation of cooling and moderator circuit piping in the heavy water plant near the town of Arak, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in a confidential report issued to member states late on Thursday.
Nuclear analysts say this type of reactor could yield plutonium for nuclear arms if the spent fuel is reprocessed, something Iran has said it has no intention of doing. Iran has said it "does not have reprocessing activities", the IAEA said.
In its previous report on Iran, in November, the Vienna-based U.N. agency said installation work at Arak was continuing, without giving any indication of how far advanced it was.
Iran rejects Western allegations it seeks to develop a capability to assemble nuclear weapons, saying its atomic program is entirely peaceful and that the Arak reactor will produce isotopes for medical and agricultural use.
Iran says it plans to begin operating the facility in the first quarter of 2014, the IAEA said. Tehran last year postponed the planned start-up from the third quarter of 2013, a target that Western experts said always had seemed unrealistic.
The Arms Control Association, a Washington-based research and advocacy group, said late last year that it was questionable whether Iran would be able to meet the new target date as well, in view of "significant delays and impeded access to necessary materials" because of international sanctions imposed on Iran.
Western worries about Iran are focused largely on uranium enrichment plants at Natanz and Fordow, as such material refined to a high level can provide the fissile core of an atomic bomb. But experts say Arak may also be a proliferation issue.
The Arak facility is a "growing source of concern", said Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the non-proliferation and disarmament program of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), a London-based think-tank.
Israel, believed to be the Middle East's only nuclear-armed state, sees Iran's nuclear program as a serious danger and has threatened to attack its atomic sites if diplomacy and sanctions fail to resolve the decade-old dispute.
If it does, the nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordow and Arak in central Iran are likely to be targets. Fitzpatrick said it could be Arak that triggers a conflict because attacking it after it is launched could cause an environmental disaster.
TESTING FUEL FOR ARAK REACTOR
Thursday's quarterly IAEA report showed Iran expanding its uranium enrichment program in defiance of tightening Western sanctions, installing advanced centrifuge machines at its main enrichment plant near the town of Natanz.
The report, issued just a few days before six world powers and Iran are due to resume negotiations after an eight-month hiatus, underlined the tough task facing the West in seeking to pressure Tehran to curb its nuclear activities.
Cliff Kupchan, Middle East director at the Eurasia consultancy, said Iran had adopted a defiant policy of pressing ahead with its nuclear program, despite harsh sanctions.
"As a result, Israel and the U.S. Congress will press a receptive U.S. administration to move forward with new and even harsher sanctions," he said in a research note.
Enriched uranium can fuel nuclear power plants, Iran's stated aim, but also provide the explosive core of a nuclear weapon if refined much further. Making plutonium from spent fuel is a second way of obtaining potential bomb material.
The Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a U.S. think-tank, noted that Iran planned to use a medical research reactor in Tehran, known as TRR, to test fuel for Arak.
"The TRR is now more than a medical isotope production reactor, Iran's stated use for the reactor, and is necessary for the operation" of Arak, it said in a report.
If operated optimally, the heavy-water plant could produce about nine kilograms (20 pounds) of plutonium a year, or enough for about two nuclear bombs annually, ISIS has said previously.
"Before it could use any of the plutonium in a nuclear weapon, however, it would first have to separate the plutonium from the irradiated fuel," it added on its website.
Iran has repeatedly declared it has no plans to reprocess the spent fuel. But, "similarly sized reactors ostensibly built for research" have been used by India, Israel, North Korea and Pakistan to make plutonium for weapons, Fitzpatrick said.
(Editing by Mark Heinrich)
15 comments:
Drop the nuclear sites before they get to far.
Nuke korea while ur at it...
Why do we let countries which blatantly show such disregard for human life exist?
They drape israeli flags over there bombs saying wipe israel off the map.
And over in korea they make videos and threaten the usa with missile strikes and nuke strikes.
Why are we just letting them openly threaten us and let them continue research on either nukes in irans case or long range rockets in n koreas case...
Are our government leaders asleep at the wheel?!
Nuke the SOB'S BEFORE ITS TO LATE!!!
Wow! Someones keen for the victory of the NWO and enslavement...
do you really think north koreas a threat? Their latest test only yielded equivalent to 12 kilotons of TNT. that's not even as powerful as the trinity test, which yielded 20 kilotons. some of the u.s's icbms carry thermonuclear warheads with 100 kilotons (the W87 yields 475 kilotons). the previously used W56 yielded 1.2 MEGAtons....North Korea is no treat. its just a little fat dictator with WAY too much pride for that little $#!T#@!E he runs
Paul sheldon I vote we should kick u out of the country.
Which country would that be Anonymous keyboard warrior?
this is the second anonymous guy speaking to the first one. lay off paul! at least he knows what he's talking about
Getthembefore they get us they threaten us every day we went in to a country cuz we thaught they had em n the ones that don threaten us withthenevery day we do nothing the world would be better off without loose cannons like that we should have to live in fear of attake just like others like isreal preparebomb shelters i say bomb the fuckers till they give up there nuke program we shouldnt alliw another country to threaten us like that
''at least he knows what he's talking about'' So it seems you are as stupid and ill informed as he is, anonymous coward number 2. Using names would be a start to me giving you two any respect.
change of heart, nuke em for 5 mins. on high, remove israeli flag, stir evenly with spoon, nuke em for additional 2 mins. (cooking times may vary depending on nuke model)
2 anonoymous guy paul i ment for him to stop rabbling u.
lay off paul !!!! ....he's a dreamboat <3
wtf lol poor paul. he's got all these random people. for all he know, we all could just be one creepy dude having one arguement with paul posing as three people for his own strange amusement. and now there's 13 comments! unlucky!
the NWO became self-aware nov.3rd 2009
what do you mean self aware?
it was just a play of words from the movie terminator...but i was talking about an event that is very real...the rebirth of the holy roman empire,the new world order that everyone speaks of...it came into being at " the treaty of Lisbon" in november 3rd of 2009...the beast of revelations is now here...and in its cruel inhumanity will make those robots on terminator look like boyscouts...at first things will look good,there will be a short peace,or truce maybe after a major world conflict,and when the world is brought to the edge of self destruction, this NWO will provide an "answer" but it will be security at the loss of freedom and human dignity. and if God in heaven does not shorten these days, there will be no one left.
Post a Comment