Infolinks In Text Adds

click and like

click and like
click on banner and like

Please Donate Today Help us Upgrad

We don't receive any corporate sponsorship and can really use any donations you wish to give us. Even the smallest contributions can really help us.we need green screen cameras and computers to start live streaming You can donate to us, directly to our Paypal Account. Thank you for any support you can give us.

Translate

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Putin to USA: 'Don't interfere with our affairs either'


 

Vladimir PutinPrime Minister Vladimir Putin had an interview with Larry King on November 30. The full interview is going to be aired on December 1, at 9 p.m. ET, but CNN has already posted some excerpts of the interview on its website.

Larry King is one of the most popular talk shows on American television. Mr. King stated that the last edition of his program will be broadcast on December 16, 2010. King talked to Putin in 2000. This time, however, the communication took place in the form of a video conference. Putin was answering King's questions in Russian.
One could predict that King would ask Putin about the WikiLeaks documents. The legendary host was interested in Putin's reaction to the statements from US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who supposedly told his French counterpart that "Russian democracy has disappeared and the government was an oligarchy run by the security services."
When answering the question, Putin stated that Gates was "deeply misled." Putin referred to peculiarities of the US election system saying that in two presidential elections held in the United States, the winner had received a smaller share of the popular vote but won with a majority in the Electoral College, where votes are apportioned by state population.
"When we are talking with our American friends and tell them, there are systemic problems in this regard, we can hear from them 'Don't interfere with our affairs. This is our tradition and it's going to continue like that.' We are not interfering," he said. "But to our colleagues, I would also like to advise you, don't interfere either [with] the sovereign choice of the Russian people."
As for suggestions about Putin holding the real power in Russia, the prime minister said that they were aimed "to slander one of us" (either Putin or Medvedev).
Anyway, the WikiLeaks publications are not a catastrophe, Putin believes. Some experts believe that someone expressly briefs WikiLeaks to use this for their own political ends later, Putin said. He suggested that diplomatic services should be more careful about their official correspondence.
Larry King was interested in Putin's opinion about a new arms race, which may occur if Russia and NATO disagree on the joint missile shield and if the USA does not ratify the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.
"That's not our choice. We don't want that to happen. But this is not a threat on our part. We've been simply saying that this is what all of us expects to happen if we don't agree on a joint effort there."
He also said that Russia would "put in place new strike forces ... against the new threats which will have been created along our borders." "New missile, nuclear technologies will be put in place," Putin added. This would happen if NATO rejects all of Russia's suggestions.
The traditional question about the next presidential vote in Russia received a traditional answer. Putin said that he and Dmitry Medvedev would make a coordinated decision.
"We'll see. There is still quite time before the elections take place," he said.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

btw . . .

The National Popular Vote bill could guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. Elections wouldn't be about winning states. Every vote, everywhere would be counted for and directly assist the candidate for whom it was cast. Candidates would need to care about voters across the nation, not just undecided voters in a handful of swing states.

The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes--that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

The Electoral College that we have today was not designed, anticipated, or favored by the Founding Fathers but, instead, is the product of decades of evolutionary change precipitated by the emergence of political parties and the enactment by states of winner-take-all laws.

The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for president.

The bill has been endorsed or voted for by 1,922 state legislators (in 50 states) who have sponsored and/or cast recorded votes in favor of the bill.

In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). The recent Washington Post, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard University poll shows 72% support for direct nationwide election of the President. Support for a national popular vote is strong in virtually every state, partisan, and demographic group surveyed in recent polls in closely divided battleground states: CO-- 68%, IA --75%, MI-- 73%, MO-- 70%, NH-- 69%, NV-- 72%, NM-- 76%, NC-- 74%, OH-- 70%, PA -- 78%, VA -- 74%, and WI -- 71%; in smaller states (3 to 5 electoral votes): AK – 70%, DC – 76%, DE --75%, ME -- 77%, NE -- 74%, NH --69%, NV -- 72%, NM -- 76%, RI -- 74%, and VT -- 75%; in Southern and border states: AR --80%, KY -- 80%, MS --77%, MO -- 70%, NC -- 74%, and VA -- 74%; and in other states polled: CA -- 70%, CT -- 74% , MA -- 73%, MN – 75%, NY -- 79%, WA -- 77%, and WV- 81%.

The National Popular Vote bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers, in 21 small, medium-small, medium, and large states, including one house in AR (6), CT (7), DE (3), DC (3), ME (4), MI (17), NV (5), NM (5), NY (31), NC (15), and OR (7), and both houses in CA (55), CO (9), HI (4), IL (21), NJ (15), MD (10), MA(12), RI (4), VT (3), and WA (11). The bill has been enacted by DC, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington. These seven states possess 76 electoral votes -- 28% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.

See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com

WorldWar3news UK

WorldWar3news UK
join facebook group click on picture

Popular Posts