Infolinks In Text Adds

click and like

click and like
click on banner and like

Please Donate Today Help us Upgrad

we need $3000 usd We don't receive any corporate sponsorship and can really use any donations you wish to give us. Even the smallest contributions can really help us.we need green screen cameras and computers to start live streaming You can donate to us, directly to our Paypal Account. Thank you for any support you can give us.

Translate

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Why wasn't Boko Haram labeled a terrorist group sooner?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

because a certain closet muslim president didnt want to offend them so he reached out to them in kindred spirit in hopes he could imbrace his basest self while also holding on to his liberal atheistic lifestyle. much like king herald loved himself and his hedonistic world but at the same time was mesmorized by john the babtist's rightousness and mysterious faith in the unseen, which to the man that has everything that a temporal world has to offer its something yet attained and seemingly out of reach. in short the president of nigeria was strongly advised to back off of the boko huron and seek a diplomatic approach with with heavy emphasis on appeasement and respect to cultural diversity

Anonymous said...

*boko haram*

Anonymous said...

lol...i guess they finally got their haram

Anonymous said...

much like the administrations embracement and indorsement of the terrorists org. known as the muslim brotherhood and the covert tactics of u.s. ngo's to bring them to power, the current adm. seemed to embrace boko haram til this embarrissing 300 girl kidnapping and sexual exploitation that the adm. now finds a hard sell and are now distancing themselves from their privious behavior towards the group. but are still defending their chastisement of the nigerian government for percieved " heavy handedness" in their national fight against muslim extremist who if the shoe was on the other foot would be quickly labeled as terrorist! what arogance for us to kill obl and call it a victory against terrorism, but when a smaller country is fight their version of that same battle we throw up referee flags and call foul and whine about the boko harem being mistreated and their cultural diversity stymied! their roving murdering thugs and rapists! what happened to making a distinction between moderate muslims = good guy vs muslims extremist = bad guy? its a little scary now that our government is now blurring the line and apparently making no distinction....and what was the 911 war on terror objectives? who is now the ones under survielance and reduced freedoms and constant groping at airports? ...it seems now the "muslim extremist" was merely a tool to subjugate the masses and roll back freedom like it was one big mistake. and i would be less than human to not share my perhaps paranoid take on all this, but everyone has a brain for pondering lives mysteries and the obvious.

Anonymous said...

and if michele really did think of those girls as her own as she is saying in the news interview...let me rephrase...if boko haram had her two girls im without doubt that nothing within our disposal would held back...we would send the full might of our special forces. so a month later...dress it up,spin it out! places everyone! its primetime reality tv!

Anonymous said...

it astonishes me that the obama administration is defending boko harams right to exist and scolding the nigerian gov. for simply defending its citizens against a terrorist group that is killing christians on sight who do not convert to islam. and at the same time christian u.s. soldiers who put their lives on the line are sanctioned for speaking out about their faith.i guess christians freedom of expression and right to exist holds no merit or value to this president. sadly, im a democrat but if it comes to choosing between God or the party or their new found love and apparent favortism to islam i will be beheaded instead of converting mr. president. and you and your muslim cohorts will be judged by God and have to account for the blood of slain christians. because you condone and sympathize with a group that takes the lives of african christians simply for being christians, you put yourself in their camp and are just as guilty as them. and you publicly profess to be christian? ...if it walks like a duck then its a duck...and your no dove

WorldWar3news UK

WorldWar3news UK
join facebook group click on picture

This Day in History